Free consult & free copy of book

E-Myth – “Why most small businesses don’t work & what to do about it”

Contact Us


Most 5 star CPA Google reviews in Canada

Read Reviews

Chartered Professional Accountants E Myth

1 Fixed Monthly Fee - Planning | Accounting | Taxes | Consulting

Helping Canadian businesses beat the odds!

CFO services | Contractors Versus Employees

Massive problem that many business owners how is they have been crushed financially by retroactive people remittances says CFO services. The reason for this is that they have received several retroactive people remittances, penalties, and interest because there contractors have been deemed employees by CRA. This is devastating to a business because they have no choice but to pay that massive fine, on a problem that was completely avoidable from the beginning.

The reason why hiring unincorporated contracts is very risky because many business owners think that is not a problem because we have been doing it for many many years and they have never had a problem. However this is not an indication that they will get away with it forever. Hiring employees as contractors is a way that businesses attempt to avoid paying the regular deductions they would have to pay if they were hired on as employees. CFO services says thereís only two ways back in the business owner can avoid this problem in their business. That is to people as employees or incorporated contractors.

Successful companies appoint this problem altogether because they either hire employees or incorporated contractor says CFO service. This becomes in years incorporated person a contractor. All businesses can avoid this problem in their businesses forever hire employees, or doctors who are incorporated. Problems arise with companies when the CRA audits the company to determine if they are paying people as contractors when they should be deemed employees. To minimize the risk, businesses can hire employees or hire contractors corporations set up, and then all of the risk is best to that contractor. Business owners can avoid all issues by not hiring unincorporated contractors from the beginning.

The other process can be very difficult one for businesses to go through said CFO service. Business owners believe that they will be able to convince CRA to rule the way they want them to rule, but this is rarely the case. CFO services says auditor will have dozens of questions they will be asking not only the business owner but the employees and staff as well. Entrepreneurs with this problem rarely get favourably from the CRA. Their sole job is to judge the business so the auditors donít look at them much emotion is that the people working for them are employees, and the business owner is arguing that they are contractors. Sometimes the CRA will call the business and asked to speak to the staff that have been claimed as contractors, they will have conversations with them to determine if they are in fact employees. They will investigate, as well as interview the owner. When they have come to the conclusion, you will submit the report business owner will get a letter in the mail saying if they have been found guilty or not. Then the business owner must pay their significant penalties. There wonít be an opportunity for business owner to appeal it says CFO service.

The problem that business owners can to if they have been paying their employees as contractors says CFO services, is that if they are audited by the CRA, they can be financially crushed by the retroactive payroll remittances, penalties and interest. Businesses risk this because they are trying to save money in order to avoid running out of cash, but this is not a risk worth taking.

The first thing that business owners must realize is why this practice is really not recommended says CFO service. Business owners try to avoid paying employee deductions like CBP and EI, therefore they hire on employees and call them contractors. Once they do this they donít pay the deductions that they would have to pay if they were employees. The CRA is not a fan of this, because that is how they collect their taxes. The only problem arises when businesses hire on employees as contractors when they arenít. Business owners can avoid this problem altogether if they either hire an employee, or hire a incorporated contractor.

So what will happen if audits a business, says CFO services. They will gather all of the information, and make a judgement based on their findings. Their sole job is to be very judicious at who is a contractor because thatís how they collect their taxes. Itís a rather heartless process says CFO service, and the business owner pays the bill.

What business owner can receive as a sign is quite significant. The judgement will be the amount of CBP and EI that was failed to be collected which could be as much as five to $7000 per employee. Multiply that by the number of employees, multiply that by the number of years those employees were working for a business owner, plus interest plus penalties. Itís not uncommon for a business to be assessed over $1000. A penalty like this can financially ruin a company. Before a business owner hires on a play as a contractor in order to save some money, they should ask themselves if this is a risk theyíre willing to take.

Since the only way a business owner can avoid this problem is to just not hire employees as contractors, but which the business owner do if they have employees that they are paying as contractors? CFO services says that this is not a difficult problem to solve. All they have to do is change the way they pay those employees. Since many employees arenít fans of business owners changing the rules on them, a great way an employer might be able to do this, is change it at a pay increase time, and they play can see it as a part of their raise, or the employer compelled employee that as a way for them to get a raise, they can incorporate themselves.

This shouldnít even be a problem in business, itís not worth it to risk so much to save so little says CFO service. Business owners can easily fix this if they have made that mistake in the beginning.