Free consult & free copy of book

E-Myth – “Why most small businesses don’t work & what to do about it”

Contact Us

Stars

Most 5 star CPA Google reviews in Canada

Read Reviews

Chartered Professional Accountants E Myth

1 Fixed Monthly Fee - Planning | Accounting | Taxes | Consulting

Helping Canadian businesses beat the odds!

Business Bootcamp | Keep Audits and Reviews Important in Business

Business bootcamp will warn that sometimes owners will say that they need a significant amount of money to borrow for their business so before they need to review. They are looking for potentially 100,000, 200,000 400,000 or up to $1 million. Biggest bootcamp however says that if it is not up to $10 million or past that a notice to reader is simply acceptable.

It might be an interesting experiment to have two CPAs involved if you really need a review. Often times not can be a wonderful idea and a very big power moves. One CPA can help you with the internal reporting, while the other CPA can do the review to make sure the other CPA was on track with the numbers. By segregating it you get the best of both worlds.

Consider the fact that your financier still wants quality income statements. Also, consider the fact that with two CPAs you will still retain quality representation throughout the whole year.

It’s those interims that are driving the business decisions. People are waiting for the end of the year to hire new staff buy new equipment etc. they need the numbers in the finance financials immediately and as soon as possible.

Things with the bank has changed quite a lot over the years back in the days CPAs have seen loans of $10 million with notice of reader statements. It isn’t often that happens but it can happen.

Business bootcamp says that owners got locked up often times in the fact that the banks of always have a tendency to change their rules and their stance. For example a policy in place five years ago may not necessarily be in place now. Owners now still think that they need a review engagement by the banks again have softened some of the rules on that front. Considerations from the owners will need definitely to be revisited.

Sometimes, the review process is often very calm productive. Sometimes the client frankly is not better off, but worse off by getting reviewed the bank, although they don’t want reviews and audited statements as they are simply good with NTR, sometimes however they are no longer good with just the annuals.

Business bootcamp says that they want quality interim reports generated by the client. That’s where the charter professional accountant can come in. They want to make sure that it is in fact quality statements and they are going to query any numbers that they find our unusual and out of place potentially. The client is unable to do it by themselves, that’s where they have the charter professional accountant come in. You can tell prepare interim statements and then objectively review the interim statements that you helped prepare. You have to be objective at the end of the day. The banks aren’t concerned about whether you could’ve had things happen last year. However they want to know what happened up until they write you the check.

Business bootcamp should consider the fact that you definitely need to have a very solid communication and relationship with your charter professional accountant. There are many idiosyncrasies, paperwork, etc. that you are not able to do by yourself that will definitely save you some time and money that your charter professional accountant will be able to do for you. As well, the business bootcamp will understand what certain processes and pieces of paperwork can only be done by the charter professional accountant.

Let’s taken is consideration three financial statements. The notice to reader financial statement is the lowest form of assurance. It is the financial statement that asks is the statement arithmetically correct? Consider not the fact that it is reasonable, but that it is plausible

Another financial statement that a charter professional accountant will be able to handle for the small business owner is called a reviewed financial statement. The reviewed financial statement is testing the reason abilities of the financials. This is using analysis and determining if all of the statements are actually legitimate. In order for a charter professional accountant to do that they need to do some testing.

And the final financial statement is called and audited financial statement, where in usually involves confirmations of balances. Has a charter professional accountant confirm the balances with the bank? Consider that they must confirm the receivables with the people that actually all that money and have tested that money and have come in subsequent to the year end.

Considering, says business bootcamp, your mind that you draw a line, assuming that it is a spectrum. On one end we have the notice to read assessment. This is the assessment that asks the question is it plausible. In the middle of your imaginary spectrum, we have the reviewed engagements. Remember, the reviewed engagements are asking is it reasonable. And on the complete opposite side of the spectrum, we have the audit and financial statements. In other words, has it been confirmed?

The professional obligation for the CPA is to make sure that those financial statements or at least arithmetically correct. I.e. is the balance sheet balanced, does the income statement flow into the retained earnings, and as the retained earnings flow into the balance sheet? Not that it has in fact been tested. Just that the statement itself is arithmetically correct is it plausible and reasonable?

Is a believable based on the industry, and the size the business? Audits are very counterproductive and, obviously to small business owners very counterintuitive. It is particularly counterproductive for not for profits because of the sheer scope of them. Look at the scope and the percentage of the operations. Is it worth legitimately dispensing 10% of the entire charity simply to do an audit that is potentially unnecessary. The argument often goes for no. There has to be provided some benefit to that charity a good rule of thumb is the fact that a charity with less than $250,000 shouldn’t be doing it.